Skripsi yang Bercerita: Menjelajahi Dunia Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif
##submission.synopsis##
Naskah Skripsi yang Bercerita: Menjelajahi Dunia Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif disusun untuk menjawab kebutuhan yang sering luput dalam proses akademik, yaitu kemampuan merancang penelitian yang sahih sekaligus menyampaikan gagasan secara bernas, terstruktur, dan mudah diikuti pembaca. Di banyak ruang bimbingan, kendala utama mahasiswa bukan semata kurangnya data atau teori, melainkan kegagalan menautkan pertanyaan riset, pilihan metode, dan cara menulis menjadi satu alur argumentasi yang utuh. Bagian inilah yang ingin dituntun buku ini sejak halaman awal.
Kerangka buku ini berpijak pada prinsip desain penelitian yang menuntut keselarasan antara masalah, pertanyaan, paradigma, teknik pengumpulan data, serta rencana analisis. Tradisi metodologi modern menekankan bahwa pemilihan pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, atau campuran tidak boleh ditentukan oleh kebiasaan kelas atau keterbatasan alat, melainkan oleh logika pertanyaan dan kontribusi yang hendak dicapai. Perspektif ini sejalan dengan penjelasan Creswell dan Creswell mengenai desain riset yang menempatkan kesesuaian metode sebagai fondasi validitas dan keterandalan karya ilmiah.
Di sisi lain, buku ini juga memandang penulisan ilmiah sebagai kerja retorika yang bertanggung jawab. Prosa akademik tidak harus kering, namun harus disiplin, jernih, dan dapat ditelusuri. Gagasan yang kuat layak disampaikan dengan bahasa yang tertata, karena keterbacaan adalah bagian dari kualitas argumentasi. Gagasan Helen Sword tentang pentingnya ekspresi akademik yang elegan memperkuat keyakinan bahwa ketepatan ilmiah dapat berjalan bersama kejelasan narasi, tanpa mengorbankan ketelitian.
Kekuatan skripsi juga ditentukan oleh cara penulis memperlakukan data dan etika publikasi. Integritas akademik bukan sekadar urusan angka kemiripan, melainkan ketepatan sitasi, kejujuran pelaporan, dan kesadaran atas batas temuan. COPE menegaskan bahwa dugaan plagiarisme dan pelanggaran etika ditangani melalui prosedur yang ketat, karena reputasi ilmiah dibangun oleh keterlacakan sumber dan akuntabilitas proses. Karena itu, buku ini menempatkan disiplin rujukan, transparansi metode, serta etika pengelolaan data sebagai kebiasaan kerja, bukan aksesori di bagian akhir naskah.
Pada ranah kualitatif, pembaca diajak memahami bagaimana temuan lahir dari proses analisis yang memiliki jejak keputusan. Praktik analisis tematik, misalnya, menekankan pentingnya pengembangan tema yang refleksif dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan melalui pembacaan berulang, pengodean yang konsisten, serta penulisan hasil yang menautkan bukti dan interpretasi secara wajar. Penjelasan Braun dan Clarke tentang thematic analysis memberi landasan kuat untuk melihat analisis sebagai kerja sistematis yang tetap peka pada konteks, bukan sekadar rangkuman kutipan.
Akhirnya, kami berharap buku ini menjadi pendamping yang menenangkan sekaligus menantang. Menenangkan, karena ia menyediakan peta langkah yang masuk akal dari merumuskan masalah hingga menyunting naskah. Menantang, karena ia mendorong pembaca mengambil posisi ilmiah yang dewasa, berani menyatidakan alasan metodologis, berani mengakui keterbatasan, dan berani menulis dengan akurasi yang dapat diuji. Bila skripsi adalah latihan memasuki komunitas ilmiah, maka latihan terbaik adalah yang membiasakan ketertiban berpikir, ketelitian teknis, dan kejujuran akademik sejak awal.
Referensi
Adler, R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344221116620
Ahmed, S. K. (2023). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/se58y
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M. Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
American Psychological Association. (2024, July 29). Informed consent guidance and templates for psychologists. https://www.apaservices.org/practice/business/management/informed-consent
American Psychological Association. (2026). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Association; https://www.apa.org/. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2024). Asosiasi penyelenggara jasa internet Indonesia. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia; https://apjii.or.id/. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and being (or becoming) a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Cha, J. (2024). Predictors of the credibility of social media as a news outlet: An examination of the influences of social media contacts, source perceptions, and media use. International Journal on Media Management, 26(1–2), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2025.2481826
Chao, F., Zhou, Q., Zhao, J., Xu, Y., & Yu, G. (2024). Trustworthiness matters: Effect of source credibility on sharing debunking information across different rumour types. Information Processing & Management, 61(4), 103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103747
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Cho, E. (2021). Neither Cronbach's alpha nor McDonald's omega: A commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt. Psychometrika, 86(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1
Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2020). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020979329
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2025). Plagiarism in a submitted manuscript. COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics; https://publicationethics.org/. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/flowchart/plagiarism-submitted-manuscript
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs. PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Eshet, Y. (2025). Examining the dynamics of plagiarism: A comparative analysis before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00178-z
Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Evaluation of Reflective Measurement Models. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R . Springer Nature Link. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_4
Haryanto, A. T. (2025). Survei APJII: Pengguna internet Indonesia 2025 tembus 229 juta jiwa. Detikcom. https://inet.detik.com/telecommunication/d-8047759/survei-apjii-pengguna-internet-indonesia-2025-tembus-229-juta-jiwa
Hastuti, H., Maulana, H. F., Lawelai, H., & Suherman, A. (2025). Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: A systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471
Humphreys, L., Lewis, N. A., Jr., Sender, K., & Won, A. S. (2021). Integrating qualitative methods and open science: Five principles for more trustworthy research*. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab026
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2026). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors; https://www.icmje.org/. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2026). Recommendations. ICMJE; https://icmje.org/. https://icmje.org/recommendations/
JDIH. (2022). Undang-undang nomor 27 tahun 2022. https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/832/t/undangundang%2Bnomor%2B27%2Btahun%2B2022
Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2024). Choosing between cronbach’s coefficient alpha, mcdonald’s coefficient omega, and coefficient H : Confidence intervals and the advantages and drawbacks of interpretive guidelines. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2023.2283637
Kemp, S. (2025a, February 25). Digital 2025: Indonesia—DataReportal—Global digital insights. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia
Kemp, S. (2025b, November 5). Digital 2026: Indonesia — datareportal – global digital insights. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-indonesia
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Li, H., & See-To, E. W. K. (2023). Source credibility plays the central route: An elaboration likelihood model exploration in social media environment with demographic profile analysis. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(1), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/jebde-10-2022-0038
Lin, C.-Y., & Wang, C.-C. (2025). Why do graduate students use generative AI in thesis writing? the influence of self-efficacy, time pressure, and trust. Current Psychology, 44(12), 12071–12086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08003-7
LSE. (2025, April). Using data from the internet and social media in research: ethics & consent. https://info.lse.ac.uk/. https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/divisions/research-and-innovation/research/Assets/Documents/PDF/ethics-Using-internet-and-Social-media-data.pdf
Malkewitz, C. P., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., & Hardt, J. (2023). Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ωt and the greatest lower bound. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368
Nugraha, F. A. (2025, August 6). APJII catat tingkat penetrasi internet Indonesia capai 80,66 persen. ANTARA. http://antaranews.com/berita/5019229/apjii-catat-tingkat-penetrasi-internet-indonesia-capai-8066-persen
Publication Ethics. (2025, April 2). Guidelines. Publicationethics.Org.Uk. https://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines
Reuters Institute. (2025). Digital news report 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; www.odg.it. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025
Scharp, K. M., Hintz, E. A., & Vera Zambrano, S. (2025). A special issue on qualitative theorizing and methodological advancements. Journal of Communication, 75(4), 241–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf020
Schneble, C. O., Favaretto, M., Elger, B. S., & Shaw, D. M. (2020). Social media terms and conditions and informed consent from children: Ethical Analysis (Preprint). JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.22281
Shah, Z., & Wei, L. (2022). Source credibility and the information quality matter in public engagement on social networking sites during the COVID-19 crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882705
Stahl, N., & King, J. (2020). Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.
Steele, J. (2023). Indonesia. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/indonesia
Steele, J. (2024). Indonesia. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024/indonesia
Steele, J. (2025). Indonesia. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/indonesia
Turnitin. (2026a). The similarity report. Turnitin. https://www.turnitin.co.uk/external-resources/the-similarity-report
Turnitin. (2026b). Understanding the similarity score. Turnitin Guides; https://guides.turnitin.com/. https://guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/23435833938701-Understanding-the-similarity-score
Von Unger, H. (2021). Ethical reflexivity as research practice. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/27032978
Yadav, D. (2021). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0
